# Introduction

I have seen several conversations in Rcpp-devel mailing list asking how to compute numerical integration or optimization in Rcpp. While R in fact has the functions Rdqags, Rdqagi, nmmin, vmmin etc. in its API to accomplish such tasks, it is not so straightforward to use them with Rcpp.

For my own research projects I need to do a lot of numerical integration, root finding and optimization, so to make my life a little bit easier, I just created the RcppNumerical package that simplifies these procedures. I haven’t submitted RcppNumerical to CRAN, since the API may change quickly according to my needs or the feedbacks from other people.

Basically RcppNumerical includes a number of open source libraries for numerical computing, so that Rcpp code can link to this package to use the functions provided by these libraries. Alternatively, RcppNumerical provides some wrapper functions that have less configuration and fewer arguments, if you just want to use the default and quickly get the results.

RcppNumerical depends on Rcpp (obviously) and RcppEigen,

• To use RcppNumerical with Rcpp::sourceCpp(), add the following two lines to the C++ source file:
// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppEigen)]]
// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppNumerical)]]

• To use RcppNumerical in your package, add the corresponding fields to the DESCRIPTION file:
Imports: RcppNumerical


Also in the NAMESPACE file, add:

import(RcppNumerical)


# Numerical Integration (Picture from Wikipedia)

The numerical integration code contained in RcppNumerical is based on the NumericalIntegration library developed by Sreekumar Thaithara Balan, Mark Sauder, and Matt Beall.

To compute integration of a function, first define a functor inherited from the Func class:

class Func
{
public:
virtual double operator()(const double& x) const = 0;
virtual void   operator()(double* x, const int n) const
{
for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
x[i] = this->operator()(x[i]);
}
};


The first function evaluates one point at a time, and the second version overwrites each point in the array by the corresponding function values. Only the second function will be used by the integration code, but usually it is easier to implement the first one.

RcppNumerical provides a wrapper function for the NumericalIntegration library with the following interface:

inline double integrate(
const Func& f, const double& lower, const double& upper,
double& err_est, int& err_code,
const int subdiv = 100,
const double& eps_abs = 1e-8, const double& eps_rel = 1e-6,
)


See the README page for the explanation of each argument. Below shows an example that calculates the moment generating function of a $Beta(a,b)$ distribution, $M(t) = E(e^{tX})$:

// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppEigen)]]
// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppNumerical)]]
#include <RcppNumerical.h>
using namespace Numer;

// M(t) = E(exp(t * X)) = int exp(t * x) * f(x) dx, f(x) is the p.d.f.
class Mintegrand: public Func
{
private:
const double a;
const double b;
const double t;
public:
Mintegrand(double a_, double b_, double t_) : a(a_), b(b_), t(t_) {}

double operator()(const double& x) const
{
return std::exp(t * x) * R::dbeta(x, a, b, 0);
}
};

// [[Rcpp::export]]
double beta_mgf(double t, double a, double b)
{
Mintegrand f(a, b, t);
double err_est;
int err_code;
return integrate(f, 0.0, 1.0, err_est, err_code);
}


We can compile and run this code in R and draw the graph:

library(Rcpp)
library(ggplot2)
sourceCpp("somefile.cpp")
t0 = seq(-3, 3, by = 0.1)
mt = sapply(t0, beta_mgf, a = 1, b = 1)
qplot(t0, mt, geom = "line", xlab = "t", ylab = "M(t)",
main = "Moment generating function of Beta(1, 1)") # Numerical Optimization

Currently RcppNumerical contains the L-BFGS algorithm for unconstrained minimization problems based on the libLBFGS library developed by Naoaki Okazaki. (Picture from aria42.com)

Again, one needs to first define a functor to represent the multivariate function to be minimized.

class MFuncGrad
{
public:
};


Here Constvec represents a read-only vector and Refvec a writable vector. Their definitions are

// Reference to a vector
typedef Eigen::Ref<Eigen::VectorXd>             Refvec;
typedef const Eigen::Ref<const Eigen::VectorXd> Constvec;


(Basically you can treat Refvec as a Eigen::VectorXd and Constvec the const version. Using Eigen::Ref is mainly to avoid memory copy. See the explanation here.)

The f_grad() member function returns the function value on vector x, and overwrites grad by the gradient.

The wrapper function for libLBFGS is

inline int optim_lbfgs(
MFuncGrad& f, Refvec x, double& fx_opt,
const int maxit = 300,
const double& eps_f = 1e-6, const double& eps_g = 1e-5
)


Also refer to the README page for details and see the logistic regression example below.

# Fast Logistic Regression: An Example

Let’s see a realistic example that uses the optimization library to fit a logistic regression.

Given a data matrix $X$ and a 0-1 valued vector $Y$, we want to find a coefficient vector $\beta$ such that the negative log-likelihood function is minimized:

So we can write the code as follows:

// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppEigen)]]
// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppNumerical)]]
#include <RcppNumerical.h>
using namespace Numer;
using Rcpp::NumericVector;
using Rcpp::NumericMatrix;
typedef Eigen::Map<Eigen::MatrixXd> MapMat;
typedef Eigen::Map<Eigen::VectorXd> MapVec;

{
private:
const MapMat X;
const MapVec Y;
public:
LogisticReg(const MapMat x_, const MapVec y_) : X(x_), Y(y_) {}

{
// Negative log likelihood
//   sum(log(1 + exp(X * beta))) - y' * X * beta

Eigen::VectorXd xbeta = X * beta;
const double yxbeta = Y.dot(xbeta);
// X * beta => exp(X * beta)
xbeta = xbeta.array().exp();
const double f = (xbeta.array() + 1.0).log().sum() - yxbeta;

//   X' * (p - y), p = exp(X * beta) / (1 + exp(X * beta))

// exp(X * beta) => p
xbeta.array() /= (xbeta.array() + 1.0);
grad.noalias() = X.transpose() * (xbeta - Y);

return f;
}
};

// [[Rcpp::export]]
NumericVector logistic_reg(NumericMatrix x, NumericVector y)
{
const MapMat xx = Rcpp::as<MapMat>(x);
const MapVec yy = Rcpp::as<MapVec>(y);
// Negative log likelihood
LogisticReg nll(xx, yy);
// Initial guess
Eigen::VectorXd beta(xx.cols());
beta.setZero();

double fopt;
int status = optim_lbfgs(nll, beta, fopt);
if(status < 0)
Rcpp::stop("fail to converge");

return Rcpp::wrap(beta);
}


Now let’s do a quick benchmark:

set.seed(123)
n = 5000
p = 100
x = matrix(rnorm(n * p), n)
beta = runif(p)
xb = c(x %*% beta)
p = exp(xb) / (1 + exp(xb))
y = rbinom(n, 1, p)

system.time(res1 <- glm.fit(x, y, family = binomial())$coefficients) ## user system elapsed ## 0.339 0.004 0.342 system.time(res2 <- logistic_reg(x, y)) ## user system elapsed ## 0.01 0.00 0.01 max(abs(res1 - res2)) ##  1.977189e-07  This is not a fair comparison however, since glm.fit() will calculate some other components besides$\beta$, and the precision of two methods are also different. RcppNumerical provides a function fastLR() that is a more stable version of the code above (avoiding exp() overflow) and returns similar components as glm.fit(). The performance is similar: system.time(res3 <- fastLR(x, y)$coefficients)
##  user  system elapsed
##  0.01    0.00    0.01
max(abs(res1 - res3))
##  1.977189e-07


Its source code can be found here.

# Final Words

If you think this package may be helpful, feel free to leave comments or request features in the Github page. Contribution and pull requests would be great.

Posted in Programming, R